Hello again, Babette,

>> I am trying to figure out why you seem to be such a psychological mess. What or who hurt you in your childhood? You seem to be bitter about everyone.

     Oh, babette... Really? We were having such a nice, pleasant conversation for a while.

     I'm bitter about everyone? Well, let's see... There's evidence that the national, world powers today are supporting genocide and mass murder. The United States and Britain, in particular. Like now, you are finally beginning to realize that Iran has a monarchy because your government set it up. Do you think the situation was any different in Panama, Venezuela, Indonesia, Chile, or Haiti? Are you aware that in virtually every one of these cases, the United States and/or British military volunteered its forces to overthrow a democratically-elected president? And that all of these were pretty much within the past fifty or sixty years? This isn't being "bitter about everyone."

     Compare this to your delusions. Margaret Sanger, according to every encyclopedia, did not fight for abortion, but fought for contraception. She went to prison not for abortion clinics, but for spreading information about female hygiene. Menstruation itself was prohibited from publicly available, written materials. But you seem to have this reversal of conclusions: Margaret Sanger, the humble nurse and political prisoner, is trying to genocide all minorities. But the United Nations and the Catholic Church, who provide weapons and support to those genociding minorities, are the saviors of humanity.

     Yes, I am bitter about mass murderers who are assuming the role as president, dictator, or something in between. Why are you bitter about those who have done so much for you? And why are you in love with those who have slaughtered your own people? In a psychological sense, yes, I am bitter. But in the same sense, you are Sado-Masochistic. You enjoy being hurt and you enjoy hurting other people. Thanks, but I'd rather be bitter and rational.

>>Even your idol, Fidel Castro, recently said that the socialist/marxist/communist system has not served his country well in economic terms.

     This is more than interesting. I never said anything about admiring either Fidel Castro or Che Guevara. Rather, I was simply responding to your comment about how so-called "revolutionaries" don't help others. Cuba provides more physicians to the underdeveloped world than all of the United States and Europe. Sure, Fidel Castro may have said that his system doesn't work. But it doesn't change the fact that your system doesn't work, either. Facts should speak louder than opinion, right?

>>Yes, the CIA may have helped overthrow an Iranian government decades ago, but that is not the situation now. I wish, I WISH, Iran was a colony of the Brits/USA - then we would not fear a madman who may have his hands on a nuclear weapon in the not too distant future.

     What event led to the overthrow of the colony from British/US management? I mean, every history book accepts it: upon the abolishment of the election systems in Iran by the US and British military, Iran become a de facto colony of our governments' emprise, right? So, if there's any problem with the leadership and organization of Iran today, it is the fault of the British and the US. Clearly, if they messed up the situation beyond all belief, you shouldn't be listening to them for solutions. Those people, judges and executives and senators, ought to be imprisoned for treason. But instead they're directing the new policy of creating a second monarchy there? You're being led like sheep.

     And second, as I pointed out with the case of Vanunu, the British/US are the greatest distributors of nuclear, radiological, and biological weapons. Even into the 80's, these militaries have been supplies chemical bombs and firearms to Iran in its violent conquest of Iraq. And Israel? Haven't you ever wondered how Israel got nuclear arms for being such a small country? It's already been published a thousand times since the 1980's: Vanunu revealed that the United States was illegally supplying nuclear arms to Israel. Now, I've got a question for you: you were told that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction, when the only thing the US/British government knew for a fact, was that Israel had weapons of mass destruction. Yet Iraq was invaded and Israel was not. Have you caught on yet? Have you figured out that everyone in control of these governments is lying to you about every single detail?

     If Iran has an oppressive government, thank the British and the United States. And, if it gets nuclear arms, thank the same people. This isn't complicated stuff.

>>"And he is the greatest denier or genocide and wants the destruction of Israel. I suspect you are a closet anti-zionist, if not a closet everything else."

     I am openly opposed to concentration camps. Israel uses concentration camps, such as "Camp Ofer." Therefore, I am opposed to Israel. There is nothing "closet" about fighting Fascism and genocide.

     The greatest denier of genocide are France and England. Are you familiar with Sholom Schwartzbard? He was a Jewish Anarchist who assassinated a manager of Jewish death camps, Symon Petliura. The French government arrested him and tried him in the famous Schwartzbard Trial, where it made one resounding claim that it has not reversed: Jewish death camps do not exist! At least, as far as ones built, managed, and maintained by Allied forces. This official opinion has not been reversed. Try to hear that story in any so-called "Museum of the Holocaust."

     Fortunately, Schwartzbard was acquitted for the assassination that he admitted to. After that, he wanted to settle in Palestine. But would the British allow an anti-Zionist, anti-Holocaust Jew to live where Israel would be? No, it would not, and it refused him the right to the land. If anything, it should be more than clear from history that Israel has expelled Jews from its land -- and this should be understood before trying to understand how it has "taken them in."

Sincerely,
Andy Carloff

"The war is good. No better education could be given the workers. After the tumult and the murder ceases, workers will realize to what ends availed their slavish toil--what was the aim of this flamboyant civilization. Comrades killed, life made even more precarious, the burden of it all on the shoulders of working men and women."
          --Margaret Sanger, 1914
          "The War's Lesson"