Everyone understands the value of uplifting people -- of developing individuals and communities socially, culturally, and economically. We can see this in the teachers who spend time after school helping students study. With all types of coaches, trainers, and professors, the motive is to help the student advance. To help them reach a position in life where they are economically independent and culturally thoughtful; where they are not in fear of poverty, and where they apply the skills they attained.

     We see this tendency just as much in other spheres of society. In business and industry, there are always rewards and advancement programs. The form might be piecework, quality assurance, employee stock ownership, or most commonly -- a pay raise based on how productive the worker has been.

     In charities, too, there is the same tendency. They encourage people to labor, to submit to the lifestyles created by businesses, to rent from landlords and buy from corporations. It is an attempt to mold people who are poor or homeless into laborers who produce for themselves. Everywhere, there is the interest of uplifting the poor, common masses. Or, to put it more clearly, there is an interest in integrating them into the current, social situation.

     But what happens when someone is actually "uplifted" this way? What happens when an individual rises a step on the ladder, receiving a promotion and salary increase? This is done in recognition of the individual's ability to produce more -- to add more to the total production than the others. Necessarily, this means a greater efficiency in their boss's business operations.